HP Desktop Pro MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Desktop Pro MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8350
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180413
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 01:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User LBY-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 192
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 288
37% 279 Pts
64-Core 287
18% 287 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
HP(103C 8350) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.85% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 3
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.73 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.6
6% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.85%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Anacomda QS 1TB SSD
747GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 359 343 356 369 344 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.3% Very good
Read 368
Write 329
Mixed 335
SusWrite 346
78% 344 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 23.3
95% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 46.5
77% 144 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 8A76 LD4AU004G-H2666GSC 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.7% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Desktop Pro MT Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Desktop Pro MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback