Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55D

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55D  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '17 at 22:20
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core 860
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 94
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 158
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 367
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.27
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 51.1
0% 33.8 fps
MRender 47.7
Gravity 38
Splatting 36.5
33% 40.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 262
Write 181
Mixed 184
46% 209 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 13.3
66% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 59.4
63% 105 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
416GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 108
Write 112
Mixed 110
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.25
95% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 84%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
254GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 101
Write 85.2
Mixed 92.2
70% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 2.27
4K Mixed 0.36
109% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
41.8% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 12.5
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 59.7
67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55D Builds (Compare 1,249 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback