Jginyue X99-8D3/2.5G Server

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 166%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics196% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemJginyue X99-8D3/2.5G Server  (all builds)
MotherboardJGINYUE X99-8D3/2.5G Server
Memory118.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220630
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 23:45
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2696 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 186
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 699
63% 529 Pts
64-Core 1,884
117% 1,884 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
196% Outstanding
Lighting 286
Reflection 278
Parallax 293
233% 286 fps
MRender 338
Gravity 220
Splatting 183
194% 247 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 196%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$50
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 203 130 150 373 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,250
Write 381
Mixed 731
SusWrite 234
143% 649 MB/s
4K Read 32.1
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 31.1
107% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 47.6
DQ Mixed 64.5
58% 90.5 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 102%
Great: 242%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 728GB
591GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 355 96 97 96 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.6% Very good
Read 466
Write 414
Mixed 388
SusWrite 187
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 37.7
119% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 219
170% 241 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 94%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$72
651GB free
Firmware: 033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 381 417 420 412 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 463
Write 418
Mixed 391
SusWrite 403
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 33.8
108% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 207
162% 232 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$44
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 134 129 117 122 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 140
Write 153
Mixed 127
SusWrite 127
102% 137 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
322% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
228GB free
Firmware: 1C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 68.1
Write 70.1
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 55.3
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$44
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 164 173 170 170 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 142
Write 154
Mixed 108
SusWrite 166
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
309% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70QH0-CK0 8x16GB
8 of 24 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 44.9
MC Write 41.9
MC Mixed 36.6
118% 41.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-8D3/2.5G Server Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 147%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 180%
UFO

System: Jginyue X99-8D3/2.5G Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $1,185
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback