Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardTo CX-J4125
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211217
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 07:04
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron J4125
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 34.2
1-Core 58
2-Core 114
37% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 180
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 183
11% 183 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.59% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.63 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.59%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 64GB SSD 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 266 262 203 64 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 430
Write 196
Mixed 268
SusWrite 186
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 55
4K Mixed 17.1
96% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 35.1
66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KT8GS4NE8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.63 GB/s
Latency 231
17% 231 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback