MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics108% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '22 at 07:52
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500-$80
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Memory 82.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 297
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 615
8-Core 893
94% 754 Pts
64-Core 1,042
64% 1,042 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
Sapphire(1DA2 E445) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
108% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 132
Parallax 244
94% 163 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 118
Splatting 186
142% 173 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280P4 512GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08868
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,998
Write 1,827
Mixed 1,391
387% 1,739 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 55.4
203% 73.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 746
DQ Mixed 497
391% 525 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 261%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB
838GB free, PID 61b6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 96 102 103 104 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
44.1% Average
Read 102
Write 78.7
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 101
115% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1827CC.001 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 31.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 27.5
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 32.3
99% 34.8 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,972 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback