| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago, 24 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111124 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 21 '22 at 01:34 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 37% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.4%
Good
|
54% 84.5 Pts
|
36% 298 Pts
|
23% 369 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1327 MHz, MLim: 1614 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
28.4%
Poor
|
27% 36.8 fps
|
31% 38.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
482GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 405 437 443 445 445 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
91% 405 MB/s
|
161% 53.9 MB/s
|
166% 225 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
47.7%
Average
|
49% 17.2 GB/s
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
50% 79.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 320 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $75
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $85Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 53x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 44x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 41x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
| RX 580AMD $131Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $440 |