MSI Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7966
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 01:05
Run Duration275 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 94.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
86% 150 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 634
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 647
40% 647 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
70GB free
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 245 232 223 250 238 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 286
Write 343
Mixed 252
SusWrite 236
63% 279 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 39.5
122% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 153
150% 238 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 115%
WDC WDS100T2B0C 1TB
593GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1473 820 797 792 825 810 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,547
Write 1846
Mixed 1,360
SusWrite 920
319% 1,418 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 24.2
145% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 506
340% 408 MB/s
Poor: 137%
This bench: 176%
Great: 269%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1034 847 842 802 809 811 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,051
Write 1,890
Mixed 1496
SusWrite 858
352% 1,574 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 72.2
221% 75.2 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 767
DQ Mixed 801
614% 837 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 242%
Great: 346%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
881GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 90 87 85 87 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 99
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 87.5
66% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 100%
WD WUH 721414ALE604 14TB
1TB free
Firmware: LDAZ
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 133 139 133 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 156
Write 150
Mixed 88.2
SusWrite 135
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 2.1
393% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 120%
Hitachi HUH 721212ALE604 12TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: LEGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 232 231 226 232 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 224
Write 230
Mixed 102
SusWrite 231
144% 197 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.5
327% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB
1TB free
Firmware: SNEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 183 182 182 183 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
804GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 115 116 115 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 120
Write 108
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 116
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 37.9
MC Mixed 29.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 29.7
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966) Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M9 ACK (MS-7966)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback