Today's hottest deals

HP ProLiant DL380 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProLiant DL380 G5  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory11.7 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 15:33
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5420
Proc 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 38.6
2-Core 76.5
36% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 224
23% 186 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 240GB
202GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 72 74 70 77 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 63.8
Write 29.8
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 72.8
32% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 87%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 734GB
683GB free
Firmware: 5.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 49 52 54 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 184
Write 63.1
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 51.2
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 85%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 5.20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 12 13 12 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 6.5
Write 8.8
Mixed 8.7
SusWrite 12.8
7% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Mixed 0
144% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 82%
Kingston HyperX Fury 3.0 32GB
0GB free, PID 16a5
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 56.5
Write 13.7
Mixed 9.2
25% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
32% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 1.1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 3.6
6% 2.27 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant DL380 G5 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant DL380 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback