Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 205
82% 141 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 638
61% 506 Pts
64-Core 624
39% 624 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$520
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 213
Parallax 210
187% 217 fps
MRender 254
Gravity 158
Splatting 128
141% 180 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 157%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 148 152 149 178 326 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 401
Write 118
Mixed 265
SusWrite 185
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 80.7
4K Mixed 34.4
130% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 262
201% 279 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$38
106GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 87 86 86 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 118
SusWrite 86.7
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 87%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
852GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 143 143 142 142 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 136
Mixed 85.8
SusWrite 142
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$50
311GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 88 89 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 82
Write 78.2
Mixed 60.7
SusWrite 88.7
57% 77.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62.8% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.9
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.7
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback