Today's hottest deals

Asus X200CAP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus X200CAP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X200CAP
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 13:14
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 81%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3217U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.2% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 32
2-Core 58.8
38% 54.2 Pts
4-Core 88.1
8-Core 89.1
12% 88.6 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 138D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.6
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 2.2
2% 1.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dahua C800A SSD 240GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0121A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 84 5 30 53 8.6 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.8% Very poor
Read 182
Write 277
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 30.9
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
10% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 5.3
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X200CAP Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X200CAP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback