Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 15:00
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7101TE
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 167
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 235
30% 229 Pts
64-Core 233
14% 233 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 39.5
Reflection 36.2
Parallax 51.5
32% 42.4 fps
MRender 52.5
Gravity 48.7
Splatting 39
37% 46.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BB150G7 150GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N2010121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 181 182 195 198 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 148
Write 198
Mixed 156
SusWrite 185
39% 172 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 28.6
105% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 176
131% 173 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
29GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 173
Write 68.8
Mixed 48.4
101% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
59% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FP 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 13.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback