Today's hottest deals

Amazon g4dn.xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics74.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAmazon g4dn.xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2048 x 1536 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 02:39
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48.5% Average
Memory 62.9
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 123
51% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 205
27% 201 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.7% Very good
Lighting 86.9
Reflection 114
Parallax 98.7
71% 99.8 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 92.7
Splatting 99
82% 101 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 80%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 137GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 125 125 125 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.9% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 42.5
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 126
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 6.2
1,081% 5.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 98.9%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.7% Poor
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 5.1
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical g4dn.xlarge Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Amazon g4dn.xlarge

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback