Today's hottest deals

Acer TravelMate B117-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer TravelMate B117-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lepus_BA
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 08:54
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 53%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3160
CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Memory 29.2
1-Core 10.9
2-Core 21.6
15% 20.6 Pts
4-Core 32.1
8-Core 40.8
5% 36.4 Pts
64-Core 38.8
2% 38.8 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 33%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 108C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.4 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.83%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 121 109 111 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.3% Below average
Read 251
Write 121
Mixed 134
SusWrite 111
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 12.7
47% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 76.5
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 72.9
54% 72.4 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 3.1
9% 3.03 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate B117-M Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate B117-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback