Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '17 at 02:46
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 249
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 785
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 992
61% 992 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 203
Parallax 180
153% 190 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 180
Splatting 125
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,190
Write 1,818
Mixed 1,698
423% 1,902 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 60.1
204% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 191
197% 322 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 279%
Great: 353%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$235
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 61% Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$45
240GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 132
Write 113
Mixed 111
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.22
63% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
84GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.1% Good
Read 104
Write 110
Mixed 95.3
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.35
86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD BLS4G4D240FSA.M8FAD 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
100% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 41.6
MC Mixed 35.7
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 100%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback