Lenovo 3664A4U

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 3664A4U  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '22 at 19:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 138
60% 98.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 189
24% 183 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Legend(17AA 308C) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 221 228 229 228 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 236
Write 194
Mixed 189
SusWrite 223
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 17.6
65% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 20.4
DQ Mixed 33.2
35% 61.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMR1870ED48E8F1333 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38.6% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 13.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 11.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3664A4U Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3664A4U

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback