Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 V2-$305 3,748 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 178 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 308 38% 290 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.21% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.6 Parallax 1.4 3% 3.6 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 3% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.21% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 204 204 206 212 211 MB/s Performing below potential (58^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.4% Good	Read 258 Write 236 Mixed 233 SusWrite 212 53% 235 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 61.6 4K Mixed 34.5 120% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 155 129% 185 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F 12GB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	34.3% Below average	MC Read 11.6 MC Write 11.4 MC Mixed 9.8 31% 10.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 10.9 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	150x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	90x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	72x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87