HP 810-230qe

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemHP 810-230qe  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2AF3
Memory20.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 09 '22 at 22:11
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 79.7
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 184
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 506
51% 413 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 745 (OEM)-$60
HP(103C 6893) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1032 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 9.2
10% 12.8 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.5
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 341 339 340 290 95 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 65% Great: 99%
Sandisk SDSA6DM-016G-1006 16GB
8GB free
Firmware: U221006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 48 48 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Read 238
Write 46.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 48
21% 96 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 8.6
38% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 26.9
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 12.9
11% 16.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 16.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 19.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 810-230qe Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP 810-230qe

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback