Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1998
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 07 '22 at 15:12
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 71.3
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 175
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 299
41% 306 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 1998) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5144
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.5
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 150 240GB-$196
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFZ12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 138 159 167 132 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 428
Write 403
Mixed 325
SusWrite 169
74% 332 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 190
183% 289 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB HMT451U6AFR8A-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 98.4
41% 98.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF Builds (Compare 6,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback