Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.99% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 29 '22 at 10:19
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$89
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 221
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 676
68% 552 Pts
64-Core 865
54% 865 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.99% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 6.7
6% 7.73 fps
MRender 9.6
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7
7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.99%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
406GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 436 424 449 448 462 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 438
Mixed 384
SusWrite 444
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 73.4
4K Mixed 45.9
150% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 134%
WD Elements 2621 1TB
582GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 38.7
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 41.9
54% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TS1GLH64V1H 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 11
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-Designare EX-CF Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Designare EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $713
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $212Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback