Today's hottest deals

Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 28 '22 at 01:20
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$40
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 181
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 252
34% 253 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
EVGA(3842 2662) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 24.4
18% 25.4 fps
MRender 33.5
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 25.2
23% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$57
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 351 348 356 359 345 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 420
Write 382
Mixed 381
SusWrite 345
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 52.3
169% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 358
269% 359 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 107%
Great: 128%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
158GB free
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 253 194 134 112 103 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 389
Write 370
Mixed 198
SusWrite 175
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 0.4
63% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 32.5
DQ Mixed 74.3
60% 88.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.5
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 17.5
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,657 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $254
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback