Today's hottest deals

Alienware Aurora-R4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemAlienware Aurora-R4  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07JNH0
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131126
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateSep 26 '22 at 05:05
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 81.7
2-Core 220
69% 126 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 652
65% 532 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$237
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2802 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.68
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 196
Parallax 206
150% 195 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 196
Splatting 131
125% 155 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 133%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 500GB
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 403 388 423 435 371 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 427
Mixed 376
SusWrite 409
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 38.7
124% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 364
269% 353 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$215
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 417 411 437 444 451 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 444
Write 413
Mixed 393
SusWrite 433
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 41.1
131% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 365
271% 358 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 101%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
385GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 235 232 245 247 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68% Good
Read 243
Write 236
Mixed 224
SusWrite 241
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 35.6
110% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 199
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 68%
Great: 132%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 34.9
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 96%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora-R4 Builds (Compare 1,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora-R4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback