Cyberpowerpc TRACER VI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive400% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
CPU throttled at 88% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
22 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemCyberpowerpc TRACER VI  (all builds)
MotherboardCyberPowerPC TRACER VI EDGE I17E
Memory24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 08 '22 at 03:03
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
CPU Throttled 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 75.8
1-Core 177
2-Core 380
108% 211 Pts
4-Core 731
8-Core 1,184
117% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,697
105% 1,697 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti (Laptop)
Device(1D05 1175) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1289
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 188
Parallax 167
147% 179 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 133
Splatting 124
118% 148 fps
Poor: 96%
This bench: 130%
Great: 135%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
698GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2384 2491 2589 2403 2258 2259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
400% Outstanding
Read 2,798
Write 2,810
Mixed 2,351
SusWrite 2397
583% 2,589 MB/s
4K Read 72.4
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 85.9
309% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,615
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 971
735% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 400%
Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
151% Outstanding
MC Read 61.2
MC Write 57.9
MC Mixed 55.9
167% 58.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.9
SC Write 48.5
SC Mixed 31.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 88.7
45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 151%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TRACER VI Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Cyberpowerpc TRACER VI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback