Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H97M-HD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive105% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H97M-HD3  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140626
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 08:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 187
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 340
48% 352 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.1% Average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 68.6
Parallax 47.1
42% 55.6 fps
MRender 61.8
Gravity 57.2
Splatting 51.1
46% 56.7 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 460 240GB-$203
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 418 457 478 465 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 459
Mixed 374
SusWrite 422
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 38.8
146% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 280
226% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 105%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
210GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 426 447 466 459 456 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 468
Mixed 440
SusWrite 432
104% 462 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 57.5
188% 67.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 298
242% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.9
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H97M-HD3 Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H97M-HD3 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback