PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Samsung Samsung DeskTop System (all builds) |
Motherboard | SAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System |
Memory | 3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20111216 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 02 '22 at 10:01 |
Run Duration | 160 Seconds |
Run User | LKA-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
64%
Good
|
65% 113 Pts
|
39% 300 Pts
|
20% 332 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
|
20.1%
Poor
|
19% 26.7 fps
|
23% 28.7 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Memory Ghost SSD 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 31 24 27 29 21 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
15% 67.8 MB/s
|
22% 8.27 MB/s
|
16% 36.3 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
140GB free
Firmware: VM100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 49 48 48 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
32% 43 MB/s
|
117% 0.73 MB/s
|
|
![]() Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
96GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 136 137 138 138 MB/s
|
75.3%
Very good
|
67% 91.5 MB/s
|
206% 1.63 MB/s
|
|
![]() JetFlash Transcend 16GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.8 MB/s
|
24.2%
Poor
|
15% 14 MB/s
|
271% 3.9 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
47.6%
Average
|
48% 16.9 GB/s
|
36% 12.5 GB/s
|
48% 82.9 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 233x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 187x |
Core i3-2120Intel $74Bench 51%, 77,810 samples | 107x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 243x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 154x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 99x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |