Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG Samsung DeskTop System
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20111216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 02 '22 at 10:01
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 78.7
1-Core 85.4
2-Core 174
65% 113 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 320
39% 300 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 64%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 26
Parallax 31.2
19% 26.7 fps
MRender 32.1
Gravity 29.3
Splatting 24.7
23% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Ghost SSD 128GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 31 24 27 29 21 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.7% Very poor
Read 170
Write 55.2
Mixed 17
SusWrite 28.3
15% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 7
22% 8.27 MB/s
DQ Read 66.2
DQ Write 37.9
DQ Mixed 4.8
16% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 78%
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
140GB free
Firmware: VM100-50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 47 47 49 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 49.5
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 48
32% 43 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 32%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
96GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 136 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 126
Write 36.3
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 136
67% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 77%
JetFlash Transcend 16GB
5GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.6 8.5 8.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 30.8
Write 4.7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 8.5
15% 14 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 2
271% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
47.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 10.6
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback