Today's hottest deals

ATI BONEFISH

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemATI BONEFISH  (all builds)
MotherboardATI BONEFISH
Memory0.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 03:32
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron M 440
U23, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Memory 51.5
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 18.5
24% 29.5 Pts
4-Core 18.4
8-Core 18.4
2% 18.4 Pts
64-Core 18.6
1% 18.6 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 32%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKT1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 94 97 91 96 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.4% Very poor
Read 95.3
Write 21.3
Mixed 28.4
SusWrite 94.5
13% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 7.2
33% 8.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.5
MC Mixed 1.8
7% 2.43 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 0.4
6% 2.1 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 15%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback