Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266 8,235 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	72.8% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 97.3 2-Core 192 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 481 48% 393 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 72.8% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8307) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 0.5 1% 0.63 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.3 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 234GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 240 232 238 240 240 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	69.8% Good	Read 248 Write 231 Mixed 237 SusWrite 239 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 35.8 117% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HX318C10F/4 2x4GB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 19.6 MC Mixed 17.5 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 17 SC Mixed 17.3 50% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 68%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 35%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	30x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	28x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	27x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	25x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	15x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	11x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 16,567 samples	12x
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 54%, 12,350 samples	11x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	8x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $494