Today's hottest deals

Asus P5B-VM SE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5B-VM SE  (all builds)
Memory1.3 GB free of 4.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070823
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 22:00
Run Duration417 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual E2200-$54
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Memory 68.7
1-Core 25.5
2-Core 54.4
35% 49.5 Pts
4-Core 54.6
8-Core 53.2
7% 53.9 Pts
64-Core 55.1
3% 55.1 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G965 Express Chipset Family
Asus(1043 823B) 384MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1930
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E660 500GB
288GB free
Firmware: GR2ZB230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 86 63 92 96 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 94
Write 73.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 88.4
52% 72 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2013)
218GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 65 42 38 33 31 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 78.3
Write 78.8
Mixed 41.8
SusWrite 44.6
45% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4GB
null MHz
2048, 512, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 4 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.17 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5B-VM SE Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B-VM SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback