Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 03:41
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 141
2-Core 283
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 843
86% 695 Pts
64-Core 1,112
69% 1,112 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$309
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
130% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 168
Parallax 158
150% 170 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 134
Splatting 116
114% 144 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 471
Write 411
Mixed 384
94% 422 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 57.8
201% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 367
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
26GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 444 450 153 26 132 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.8% Average
Read 270
Write 82.5
Mixed 38.7
SusWrite 273
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 12.2
59% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 12.4
DQ Mixed 14.8
12% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 102%
Jmicron Generic 240GB
4GB free
Firmware: 0405
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 334
Mixed 14.4
177% 247 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 14.4
2,861% 16.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 24%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
45GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 147 135 138 152 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 159
Mixed 84
SusWrite 140
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$33
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.9% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 20.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 22.2
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 2,027 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $348
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback