Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 157%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics214% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive278% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemGigabyte X299 DESIGNARE EX
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF  (all builds)
Memory21.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration360 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$393
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 230
76% 139 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 812
74% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,573
97% 1,573 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
214% Outstanding
Lighting 317
Reflection 292
Parallax 322
259% 310 fps
MRender 362
Gravity 248
Splatting 190
209% 267 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 214%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$74
555GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101020WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1377 1401 1411 1415 1407 1365 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
278% Outstanding
Read 1745
Write 2,102
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 1,396
352% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 68
254% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,191
DQ Write 854
DQ Mixed 982
744% 1,009 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 278%
Great: 335%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
932GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 474 488 485 486 485 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 435
Mixed 396
SusWrite 482
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 94.3
4K Mixed 38.2
159% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 347
260% 346 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
226GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 80 78 80 90 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 107
Write 83
Mixed 92.4
SusWrite 82.8
20% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 7.3
25% 8.4 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 128
100% 138 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 134%
Samsung MZ7WD240HAFV-00003 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: DXM87W3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 270 285 276 276 277 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Read 344
Write 285
Mixed 273
SusWrite 275
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 37.2
133% 50.1 MB/s
DQ Read 211
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 214
158% 208 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 93%
Crucial MX300 750GB-$75
405GB free
Firmware: M0CR011
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 356 344 282 283 290 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 348
Write 308
Mixed 316
SusWrite 318
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 37.9
130% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 234
176% 234 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 104%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
915GB free
Firmware: 211050WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1544 837 845 843 842 846 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
252% Outstanding
Read 1,493
Write 1722
Mixed 1,405
SusWrite 959
314% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 199
4K Mixed 78.6
283% 109 MB/s
DQ Read 1,240
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 1,042
782% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 252%
Great: 276%
Kingston SEDC1000H400G 400GB
706GB free
Firmware: E7FTD4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1765 1923 2565 1551 2198 1647 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,279
Write 3,225
Mixed 450
SusWrite 1,942
392% 1,724 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 39.3
148% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1086
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 530
524% 840 MB/s
Poor: 170%
This bench: 259%
Great: 325%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
74.6% Very good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 22.9
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 8.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 DESIGNARE EX-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,519
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback