Today's hottest deals

MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C51
MotherboardMSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220516
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 00:22
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 80.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 240
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 739
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.7.1
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 65.7
Parallax 88.2
54% 73.5 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 48.9
50% 63.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 437 440 443 447 242 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 480
Write 432
Mixed 407
SusWrite 406
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 23.6
116% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 33.8
84% 171 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 100%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 36 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 146
Write 35.4
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 25
72% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
108% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 36%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 31 31 31 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 121
Write 21
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 29.4
54% 51.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.4
288% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3200 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 43.1
MC Mixed 36.1
119% 41.6 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 40.3
SC Mixed 30.9
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 4,043 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $270
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback