Wortmann_ag 1001273;2120119

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemWortmann_ag 1001273;2120119  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Z370M D3H-CF
Memory20.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 03 '22 at 10:36
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 262
89% 161 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 816
76% 630 Pts
64-Core 1,091
68% 1,091 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 19.1
16% 18.9 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 19.6
Splatting 17.5
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSCKKW240H6 240GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF036C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 121 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Read 487
Write 268
Mixed 304
SusWrite 123
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.9
165% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 200
173% 255 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 89%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
256GB free
Firmware: 2BA30001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 103 103 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 62.1
Write 50.8
Mixed 44.4
SusWrite 101
47% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 59%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB
88GB free, PID 0727
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 18
Write 19.4
Mixed 18
SusWrite 19.7
26% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4.3
300% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 20%
Terra USThree PRO 32GB
27GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 163
Write 86.9
Mixed 77.9
124% 109 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
94% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC M378A5244CB0-CRC M378A1K43CB2-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.1% Very good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 23.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 34.1
SC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1001273;2120119 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

System: Wortmann_ag 1001273;2120119

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $303
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback