Monster ABRA A7 V8.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V8.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V8.1
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 02 '22 at 17:03
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 84
1-Core 121
2-Core 237
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 772
75% 615 Pts
64-Core 869
54% 869 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 852B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.9% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 6.3
4% 16.6 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 8.5
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.9%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 526
Write 638
Mixed 557
129% 574 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 48.2
164% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 294
247% 357 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 153%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2010)-$60
165GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 63.4
Write 64
Mixed 41.8
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C15S4/8G 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.1% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 20.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V8.1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V8.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback