SPA LCL-508

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemSPA LCL-508  (all builds)
MotherboardSPA LCL-508
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180403
Uptime14 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 15:11
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 188
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 348
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 364
22% 364 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia MX150-0
Clevo(1558 653A) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1640
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.2
Reflection 18.5
Parallax 18.9
16% 19.2 fps
MRender 16.2
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 17.2
15% 18 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 128GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MA01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 150 151 153 142 97 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 433
Write 364
Mixed 200
SusWrite 140
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 32
116% 42.5 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 136
121% 184 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
61GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 79 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 94.7
Mixed 57
SusWrite 78.4
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.6
194% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 Samsung M471A5143EB1-CRC 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 16.1
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LCL-508 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: SPA LCL-508

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback