Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.44% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-E  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '22 at 22:06
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$185
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 180
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 344
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.44% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.8
3% 4.37 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 5
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.44%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$15
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 27 9.1 13 31 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 90.1
Write 96.8
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 22
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 60%
Seagate ST2000DL004 HD20 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 114 111 118 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 100
Write 134
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 116
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 17.5
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E Builds (Compare 1,873 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-E - $311

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $545
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback