Today's hottest deals

Pegatron A15

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPegatron A15  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON A15
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 19:14
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 89.7
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 120
54% 84.8 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 152
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 153
9% 153 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Device(1B0A 2080) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.5
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 62 62 64 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 62.7
Write 62.7
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 61.4
41% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.4
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A15 Builds (Compare 385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Pegatron A15

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback