Today's hottest deals

Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X299 Killer SLI/ac  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 16:24
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 49%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7640X
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 90.7
1-Core 128
2-Core 257
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 478
61% 460 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.8% Very good
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 106
Parallax 95.9
76% 98.2 fps
MRender 90.1
Gravity 91
Splatting 94
75% 91.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 448
Write 445
Mixed 307
89% 400 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 52.2
190% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 177
182% 296 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
47GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 349 311 290 223 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 446
Mixed 421
SusWrite 269
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 39.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 58.9
203% 75.6 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 361
272% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
426GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2043 759 565 603 605 603 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,303
Write 2,096
Mixed 1,445
SusWrite 863
375% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 90.3
298% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,769
DQ Write 1,215
DQ Mixed 1,407
1,073% 1,464 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 304%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 13.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 Killer SLI/ac Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X299 Killer SLI/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $662
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback