Today's hottest deals

Dell PowerEdge R6515

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive286% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory256GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 256GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell PowerEdge R6515
MotherboardDell PowerEdge R6515  (all builds)
Memory250.5 GB free of 256 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 08:27
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7402P 24-Core
CPU1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 66.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 226
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 853
71% 614 Pts
64-Core 3,694
229% 3,694 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1410 1447 1441 1458 1455 1447 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
286% Outstanding
Read 2,045
Write 1,440
Mixed 926
SusWrite 1,443
327% 1,463 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 180
4K Mixed 67
259% 99.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,269
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 484
451% 723 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 286%
Great: 283%
Micron_5300_MTFD 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: U001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 487 487 487 488 489 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
105% Outstanding
Read 327
Write 489
Mixed 332
SusWrite 484
93% 408 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 41.7
166% 66.9 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 255
191% 253 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Micron_5300_MTFD 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: U001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 468 489 489 488 488 489 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 329
Write 485
Mixed 333
SusWrite 485
93% 408 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 41.1
166% 66.6 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 251
DQ Mixed 256
191% 254 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393A4K40DB2-CTD 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 80CE80B380CE M393A4K40DB2-CTD 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 019880B380AD 9965640-054.C00G 255GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 56.6
MC Write 59.7
MC Mixed 64.7
172% 60.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 30.9
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 150%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback