Today's hottest deals

HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 198E
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '22 at 20:38
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 242
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 631
66% 527 Pts
64-Core 642
40% 642 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.4% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 134
Parallax 122
96% 125 fps
MRender 92.8
Gravity 124
Splatting 110
89% 109 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 101%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 10 127 55 55 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 433
Write 272
Mixed 333
SusWrite 47.9
60% 271 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 88.6
4K Mixed 36.8
143% 52.6 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 139
123% 187 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-023.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP) Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G2 MT (TPM DP)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback