Today's hottest deals

HP 650 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP 650 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1858
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140513
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 20:03
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1000M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
39% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 47.7
2-Core 92.7
42% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 93.9
8-Core 94.2
13% 94.1 Pts
64-Core 91
6% 91 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1858) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.13 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.9
2% 2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
380GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 427 432 429 367 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 423
Write 412
Mixed 404
SusWrite 406
93% 411 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 31.2
102% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 169
DQ Mixed 214
157% 207 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB Samsung M471B5773DH0-CK0 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
44.6% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.4
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 650 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 650 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $50
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback