Today's hottest deals

HP 550-026

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 550-026  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 2B2C
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150401
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 15 '22 at 03:42
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 189
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 360
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Nvidia(10DE 1087) 1GB
CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 9.1
6% 7.47 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.2
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC300 2.5 7MM 128GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20100P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 189 187 193 193 193 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 477
Write 194
Mixed 240
SusWrite 190
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 25.5
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 227
178% 251 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$47
2TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 206 205 209 210 207 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 147
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 207
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 M378B1G73EB0-YK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
57.6% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 83.3
48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-026 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-026

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback