Today's hottest deals

Micros Workstation6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicros Workstation6  (all builds)
MotherboardMicros Workstation6
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom E3827
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 66.1
1-Core 12.9
2-Core 16.8
27% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 19.4
8-Core 23
3% 21.2 Pts
64-Core 12.8
1% 12.8 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Intel(8086 7270) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.52% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.52%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS32GHSD370 32GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0815B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 29 31 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 204
Write 38.3
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 29.9
18% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.8
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 16
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 47.1
DQ Write 6.2
DQ Mixed 31
22% 28.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS512MSK64W6H 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 1.4
6% 1.93 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Workstation6 Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Micros Workstation6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback