Asrock H61M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '22 at 17:51
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 179
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 508
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 513
32% 513 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.8% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 39.2
Parallax 37.1
28% 37 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 36.7
Splatting 26.1
27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
314GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0302B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 169 231 229 233 232 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45% Average
Read 217
Write 227
Mixed 36.1
SusWrite 202
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 19.4
51% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 41.7
67% 128 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45%
Great: 102%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
1GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 40.8
Write 33.8
Mixed 31.6
26% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 40%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
258GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 93 121 124 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 63
SusWrite 115
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 68%
TDK LoR TF10 16GB
0GB free, PID 0619
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.3 6.7 7.7 7.8 4.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 4.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 5.9
11% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1
75% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G KHX316C10/8 16GB
1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
42.7% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-HG4 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback