Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	31.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DN2820FYK
Memory	0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140513
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '22 at 15:42
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2820-$139 2,102 User benchmarks, average bench 27% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 58.5 1-Core 21.2 2-Core 42.7 29% 40.8 Pts	4-Core 42.6 8-Core 43 6% 42.8 Pts	64-Core 43.3 3% 43.3 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 35%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SS200S330G 30GB 159 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 86 33 52 89 85 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.5% Below average	Read 215 Write 87.6 Mixed 104 SusWrite 67.7 26% 119 MB/s	4K Read 19.8 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 7.6 57% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 77.7 DQ Write 32.7 DQ Mixed 36.1 32% 48.8 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905594-001.A00LF 1x2GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.3 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.1 13% 4.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 0.2 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	36x
HD 6000 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,021 samples	35x
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	16x

SSD
850 EVO M.2 250GBSamsungBench 102%, 28,058 samples	9x
SM2280S3 SATA M.2 120GBKingston $128Bench 65%, 1,644 samples	7x
MTS800 M.2 128GBTranscend $126Bench 69%, 5,326 samples	4x

RAM
99U5428-018.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 51%, 4,502 samples	4x
99U5428-078.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 28%, 844 samples	4x
CT102464BF160B.C16 1x8GBCrucialBench 26%, 5,265 samples	4x