Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive8.84% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200807
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 18:28
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$205
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 142
2-Core 273
92% 167 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 891
90% 729 Pts
64-Core 1000
62% 1000 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
Gigabyte(1458 407B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 115
Parallax 118
104% 120 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.1
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 12 12 7.9 12 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.84% Terrible
Read 140
Write 16.2
Mixed 42.9
SusWrite 11.3
11% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 2.7
8% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 99%
WD WD7500AZEX-00ZF5A0 750GB
46GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 155 158 154 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 127
Write 123
Mixed 77.9
SusWrite 149
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G320081 8A76 LD4AU008G-H3200GST 16GB
3000, 3000 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 12.9
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback