Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20181219
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 05 '22 at 09:20
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 78.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 234
79% 143 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 709
72% 580 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30% Poor
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 43.6
Parallax 40
31% 40.4 fps
MRender 38.8
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 29.1
29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUS724040ALE641 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MJAOA3M0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 98 93 103 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 73.5
Write 102
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 94.8
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Adata 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 28.1
88% 30.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 25.1
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 83.5
48% 83.5 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback