Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion dv9000 (RF312AV#ABA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.11% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion dv9000 (RF312AV#ABA)  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta 30BD
Memory1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20070202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '22 at 16:02
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T5600-$99
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Memory 50.7
1-Core 17.2
2-Core 31.1
24% 33 Pts
4-Core 45.3
8-Core 35.2
6% 40.2 Pts
64-Core 44.5
3% 44.5 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce Go 7600
HP(103C 30BB) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 7.15.11.7948
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.11% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 0.3
0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.11%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500LM012 HN-M500MBB 500GB
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 9.3 9.8 12 23 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Read 6
Write 7.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 11.6
6% 7.95 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.74% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.2
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 3
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.74%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion dv9000 (RF312AV#ABA) Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion dv9000 (RF312AV#ABA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $99
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback