Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 21:10
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$67
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 62.8
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 181
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 448
46% 373 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 118
Parallax 122
106% 123 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 102
Splatting 89
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 100%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1292
Write 505
Mixed 358
156% 718 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 30.7
4K Mixed 23.4
84% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 423
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 406
299% 394 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
259GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 159 162 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 128
Mixed 78
SusWrite 160
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
46GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 51 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 48.6
Write 31.8
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 49.9
31% 41.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 206 211 210 209 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 160
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 207
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 106%
SDHC Card 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Read 15.9
Write 8.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 11
13% 10.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G240081 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 10.4
MC Mixed 11.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback