Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220216
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 25 '22 at 12:41
Run Duration	299 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$265 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Memory 74.1 1-Core 148 2-Core 282 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 527 8-Core 957 89% 742 Pts	64-Core 1,484 92% 1,484 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 96%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70 163,917 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 862 101 100 107 101 100 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	184% Outstanding	Read 1,437 Write 1,315 Mixed 1,016 SusWrite 228 223% 999 MB/s	4K Read 57.2 4K Write 147 4K Mixed 75.4 261% 93.3 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 781 DQ Mixed 270 325% 562 MB/s
Poor: 127% ↑ This bench: 184% Great: 255%
WL3000GSA6454G 3TB 87 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 251GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 129 129 129 126 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	73.7% Very good	Read 130 Write 90.2 Mixed 75.7 SusWrite 127 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 187% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73.7% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 177 180 179 179 180 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 138 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 177 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 113%
Toshiba MG08ACA16TE 16TB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 1TB free Firmware: 4302 SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 251 250 249 248 248 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 60% Great: 135%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 4.5TB free Firmware: GX0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 208 204 208 211 206 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 179 Mixed 92.3 SusWrite 207 121% 165 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.7 255% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB 2,355 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 1.5TB free Firmware: GX0B SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 204 198 203 204 197 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 85 Write 103 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 201 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 6.3 4K Mixed 0.4 199% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 133%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 364GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 91 91 91 90 91 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	Read 90 Write 98.5 Mixed 58.6 SusWrite 90.8 115% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 58%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 987GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 91 91 91 90 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	49% Average	Read 145 Write 143 Mixed 111 SusWrite 90.7 163% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 126% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 59%
TOSHIBA HDWF180 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 15GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 176 177 187 178 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	89.9% Excellent	Read 210 Write 209 Mixed 92.8 SusWrite 180 229% 173 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 0.5 242% 3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 79%
TOSHIBA MG09ACA18TE 18TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 518GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.9% Average	Read 189 Write 186 Mixed 117 SusWrite 1.3 154% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.7 204% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESTK.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 24GB 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	62.8% Good	MC Read 25.3 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 23.6 64% 22.3 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 22.5 56% 19.4 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,174x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $349Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	876x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $262Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	875x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	613x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	533x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,035Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	492x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $110Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	487x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	315x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	218x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	291x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	161x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $1,388

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406