Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 191%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99 F8D
Memory186.4 GB free of 192 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210407
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 25 '22 at 02:18
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 200
66% 121 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 738
66% 557 Pts
64-Core 3,329
206% 3,329 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
Nvidia(10DE 1535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 254
Reflection 301
Parallax 378
207% 311 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 264
Splatting 196
214% 272 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 188%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vector 150 240GB-$246
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 450 452 446 447 449 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 393
Write 409
Mixed 343
SusWrite 447
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 306
240% 332 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 110%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
361GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 441 443 440 439 441 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 424
Write 402
Mixed 373
SusWrite 442
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 40.5
130% 45.6 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 245
214% 318 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 100%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6D1 36ASF4G72PZ-2G6E1 atermiter atermiter atermiter atermiter 191GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
123% Outstanding
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 43.7
MC Mixed 50.7
143% 50.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 118%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback