Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 23 '22 at 19:00
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
74% 132 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 563
57% 464 Pts
64-Core 538
33% 538 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 72%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 60
Parallax 19
11% 30.9 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 13.5
12% 14 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 975 487 854 650 427 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,100
Write 1,002
Mixed 847
SusWrite 634
201% 896 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 7
31% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 806
DQ Mixed 641
478% 619 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 119%
Great: 181%
Fujitsu MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
80GB free
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 46 46 46 46 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 38.6
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 45.9
29% 39.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD GR2666S464L19S/8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 26.8
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.2
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
Latency 87.6
46% 87.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,849 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback